Skip to content

The Culture of Well-Being

It’s interesting to see how often the healthy living and overall well being differs regionally based on a certain demographic’s cultural conditioning. There are a couple ways of looking at it. At a large scale, a country or government may emphasize values that can either foster or inhibit healthy living. Another way to think of it is having a series of sub-cultures that span between regions. For instance, I’ve been exposed to the daily living habits within various regions such as the USA, Germany, Mexico and Hong Kong. Throughout those times in my life, I’ve also been a part of various sub-cultures: childhood, higher education, office life and times of leisure. As activities and roles change in life, so does the approach to mental and physical fitness.

I came across an interesting lecture by Dan Buettner that points out the general tendencies and lifestyle choices of people within specific regions with longer lifespans. Out of the 9 diet and lifestyle habits he reveals, I’ll point out 3 here:

  1. Always moving and being active, not scheduling in physical activity but rather it being at the heart of your day
  2. Plant based diet
  3. Peers and community around you support healthy living

The reason I point out these 3 is because I find that some can be achieved by modifying daily habits, such as nutritional intake (plant based diets). Others can be almost impossible to achieve within certain sub-cultures. The largest that stands out to me are sedentary lifestyles of office environments. There are a few companies that operate in ways to promote movement and mix physical action into employee tasks. However, for the most part, office culture currently and will for some time be reacting to the advent of the personal workstation and information technology.

Video: Dan Buettner – How to live to be 100+

 

To switch gears towards food, there are some that I’ve personally cut-out (soda and french fries for some time) which have had positive effects given that I’ve spent most of my time within the USA. The fact that many restaurants in the USA, typically fast food, promote 42oz at a time and/or free refills, will give someone an instant 410 calories in addition to the meal they area eating. Keep in mind the average intake is 2,000/day for women – 2,500/day for men. While in other regions such as Germany, this is not so much of a nutritional risk.

There are many foods that are nutrient rich that I do like, however when in different locations and experiencing different daily activities I personally don’t take the time to find them (kale, nuts, blueberries, etc.) I tend to eat these foods when I have time for leisure however bypass them during the frantic conditions within a day at the office.

In summary, activities and strategies for health and well-being should be thought of within the regional context so supporting aspects can be exploited and others avoided. The same goes with sub-cultures and how they relate to the region. The combination of the two could compound and create either a positive or negative context for healthy living.

Categories: Uncategorized.

Tags: , , ,

Regional Development and Technical Nutrition

I came across two presentations that give an outlook to similar issues of energy and climate stability as related to building and city design and infrastructures. The first was presented at the ROADMAP 2050 conference in Brussels on April 11, 2010 by OMA/AMO partner Reinier de Graaf. The second one at the 2005 TED conference presented by William McDonough.

ROADMAP 2050: Reinier de Graaf & TED Conference 2005: William McDonough

I’m interested in comparing these two in particular as they both touch simultaneously on fundamental problems and solutions posed by the AEC industry on energy supply, infrastructure and the natural environment. The differences, however are in their perspectives and context in which the presentations are delivered.

Graaf was presenting to an audience interested in the connectivity of political boundaries and risks of the European Union between itself and the rest of the world as Europe commits to reduce emissions by 80% in 2050. Graaf compared the exploitations that each region of Europe can offer towards emissions reform through renewable energy. This large scale, political outlook creates what Graaf calls a “cycle of benefits” through shared regional resources by using primary, secondary and storage grids.

There are similarities here with McDonough’s perspectives during the 2005 TED Talk. McDonough refers to biological and technical nutrition as existing in a world of open metabolism. He uses the term metabolism here to describe both chemical and systemic reproduction. He uses technical nutrition to describe closed cycles in material production. These cycles, obviously, can be scaled from household products to regional system and infrastructure design as described above.

I see two main differences between the two presentations. The first being a missed opportunity of large scale interconnectedness of existing infrastructure between countries with McDonough’s focus on design and creation. The second, being a possible optimistic perspective from Graaf by accepting natural abundance, which is missing from his statement:

“The world continues to emit or maybe I should just say pollute. It’s a more straight forward, accessible term because that’s what it really is.”

I would like to see McDonough increase his focus on existing political relationships and for Graaf to develop a perspective for growth and abundance, not so much on limitation and design pessimism.

Additional info:
http://www.roadmap2050.eu/Agenda_final.pdf
http://www.oma.eu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=237&Itemid=25
http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/9/view/9816/oma-roadmap-2050.html
http://www.mcdonough.com/cradle_to_cradle.htm

Categories: Uncategorized.

Tags: , , , ,

Construction Spending & Trends in Economic Tracking Protocol

It’s been interesting to watch how the Obama administration has attempted to create a culture of transparency to fiscal policy and government spending. They’ve used various tracking and visibility vehicles such as FedBizOpps.gov (Federal Business Opportunities) to make funding and job opportunities available to anyone who can fill out a search box. There’s also recovery.gov that shows who won which contracts and for how much.

There’s also some comments of criticism to this process, such as how the statistics of fiscal responsibility get counted and analyzed for success as shown in the Engineering News-Record (Stimulus No Help to Construction Industry).

Even though much of this information was available in the public arena before, it has never been packaged and distributed in such a way for the public to gain a quick level of comprehensive analysis to make their own judgments pertaining to economic policies related to government spending and business opportunities. I am willing to accept criticism that helps build a solid future in this direction as a new way to deal with the political and economic accessibility.

Construction spending has slowed and an interest in metrics is growing in an effort to reduce risk. The accuracy and organization of such metrics need development for both big and small businesses alike, regardless of today’s market.

Categories: Uncategorized.

Tags: , , , ,

Diagram of a conversation

Diagram of a conversation by Gordon Pask 1976.

Numbers are topics, arcs are operators, and boxes are behaviors or resulting actions. Pask, 1976.

What if you could control a building with your mind? What if the buildings around you knew you were there? Not only that you were there, but what could be possible if buildings new the community of people that are present? In 2007, I presented a paper at the Shifting Positions: Bodies in Space Conference titled “Ambient Agents: Space, Architecture and The Self.” In this paper I think of a building to be very similar to how the physiology of the mind and body work, a series of mechanical, physical and biochemical reactions to an assumed set of circumstances. Buildings operate like this to some level already as a thermostat can control the airflow and temperature of a room. My interest though is how a more advanced version of assumed circumstances and reactions in a building can fundamentally change the space from both design and performance aspects by investigating “cognitive extensions of the mind in both physical and virtual spaces of a building” (Ambient Agents). There are two critical points that support this proposition. I used the following passage of the paper to describe how creating a building that acts as an appendage of the human body can create an very intimate relationship between a person and their environment:

“First, we must make a distinction between the mind and the body. The mind makes decisions and processes information. The body acts as an agent of the mind and executes the mind’s desires. Motor skills are then operated by commands sent through neural networks. We control our bodies implicitly because our muscles are directly connected to our mind. Because of this implicit and intimate connection, we associate the body with the self. We consider ourselves separate from our environment because all interactions with it are explicit and indirect, usually by means of our bodies.”

The second point has to do with my fascination with Gordon Pask’s Conversation Theory. Developing a Cybernetics System reinforces and develops the intimate relationship between a person and their environment. Breaking the mold of unidirectional communication of users opens a world of design and building performance opportunities.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this concept. I may be able to release copies of the paper as well if you weren’t able to attend the Shifting Positions conference.

Categories: Uncategorized.

Tags: , , ,